Stanley Cup Fever – with a dose of NHL Armageddon 2012
Labels: Don Fehr, Gary Bettman, Howard Bloom, National Hockey League, National Hockey League Players Association, NHL Armageddon 2012, Sports Business News, Stanley Cup Finals
An extension of Sports Business News, the largest online sports business news service -- featuring the comments and insights of SBN Publisher Howard Bloom
Labels: Don Fehr, Gary Bettman, Howard Bloom, National Hockey League, National Hockey League Players Association, NHL Armageddon 2012, Sports Business News, Stanley Cup Finals
Labels: Bountygate, Howard Bloom, Jamal Lewis, Jeremy Shockey, National Football League, NFL Network, Sports Business News, Warren Sapp
Labels: Howard Bloom, Jamal Lewis, National Football League, NFL concussion lawsuit, retired NFL players lawsuit, Sports Business News

On Monday afternoon, the National Basketball Association announced the 2014 NBA All-Star Weekend will be played at New Orleans Arena, home of the Hornets, pending the completion of the arena and hotel agreements. This will mark the second time the NBA All-Star Weekend will be hosted in New Orleans, having previously been held in the “Crescent City” in 2008.
“There is no better place to celebrate and showcase the NBA than in New Orleans, a city with a rich tradition of hosting major events that is second-to-none,” said NBA Commissioner David Stern. “Our 2008 NBA All-Star festivities proved a terrific experience for everyone involved, and we anticipate 2014 will be even better.”
Monday’s announcement capped a remarkable four days for the Hornets and the NBA in New Orleans. On Friday, New Orleans Saints Owner Tom Benson bought the Hornets for $338 million from the NBA, saving the Big Easy from losing their NBA franchise for the second time.
The NBA first arrived in New Orleans in 1974 when the league added New Orleans as an expansion team. The New Orleans Jazz left for Salt Lake City in 1979, becoming the Utah Jazz. The NBA returned to New Orleans at the start of the 2002-03 season when George Shinn moved his Charlotte Hornets to New Orleans after calling Charlotte home for 14 years.
Shinn moved the Hornets to New Orleans after he became embroiled in a sensation trial that was televised by Court TV. In 1999, a Charlotte woman accused Shinn of kidnapping and sexual assault. While the charges were later thrown out of court, Shinn did admit to having two sexual relationships outside his marriage. His reputation lost (Shinn reportedly has never returned to is His Charlotte), Shinn moved his NBA team to New Orleans.
In April 2010, Shinn began considering selling his majority share of the Hornets to Gary Chouest, who bought 25% of the team. The negotiations stalled due to the team's ongoing financial issues. Because Shinn was not in a financial position to continue to run the team, the NBA purchased the team and began looking for local ownership. The NBA completed their purchase of the Hornets from George Shinn and Gary Chouest in December 2010 for $318 million.
Not only did NBA owners get back what they paid for the team, each NBA team walked away with a profit of about $660,000.
Benson surprised many people when he bought the Hornets. In the years leading up to Hurricane Katrina, Benson talked about moving the New Orleans Saints. He purchased the Saints from John Mecom in 1985 after he learned from Governor Edwin W. Edwards that the team was on the verge of being sold to parties interested in moving the team to Jacksonville, Florida.
During the Saints' 2001 negotiations with the state of Louisiana, rumors began circulating that Benson would seek relocation if his requests — which included renovations to the Superdome, a new practice facility in suburban Metairie, and escalating annual payments from the state to the team — could not be met. Benson, born in New Orleans, owned a number of automobile dealerships in San Antonio. Time and time again Benson made veiled suggestions he was ready to move the Saints unless he received what he wanted from the state of Louisiana when it came to the Superdome (the Saints home).
NFL commissioner Paul Tagliabue (since retired) worked closely with Benson and the state of Louisiana, reaching out to both groups creating a long-term solution that would keep the Saints in New Orleans. In the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, Benson stood by the rebuilt city and ended any discussions about moving the NFL franchise. The Saints resurgence was seen as a key New Orleans post-Katrina recovery. New Orleans will host the Super Bowl in February.
There was a growing concern in New Orleans after the league had owned the Hornets for two seasons, if the NBA didn’t find a local owner in the immediate future the league would sell the team to interests outside of New Orleans and the franchise would relocate. How and why could the NBA convince Tom Benson, who but for the perception of moving his NFL team out of New Orleans following Hurricane Katrina, to save the New Orleans NBA franchise?
“I told (brother) Larry I was a little bit concerned, even though (Bhathal – NBA rep) said he wasn’t going to do it, the first downturn he’d be looking to go to California or some place,” Benson said when the sale was announced Friday night. “That wasn’t very good.
“We really never stopped talking to (the NBA). With out-of-state owners … I called David and said, ‘Look, I’m the only guy you can count on who’s really going to stay here. Let’s work this thing out.’ ”
Sports marketing expert Marc Ganis helped put the deal together. Benson had made an offer to buy the team several months ago. That proposal was turned down by the NBA. Ganis told
the New Orleans Times Picayune he believed Benson was the perfect owner for the Hornets.
“I asked (Benson) a number of times: ‘Why do you want to do this?’ ” Ganis said. “I want them to know why they’re doing it. Don’t get caught up in a bidding war, or the ego of it. His answer was consistent from (the beginning) all the way to today. He wants to make sure this team stays in New Orleans, makes sure the team is successful in New Orleans and is an important part of the community. This is not a deal that’s going to generate some windfall profits return.
“I asked David: ‘Why do you want to keep the team in New Orleans?’ If he had an interest in maximizing the profit for the league, he very easily could have sold the team to someone who could have relocated it to San Jose, Anaheim, Seattle, Las Vegas. That wasn’t his interest. That was important. Asking each of them this question independently at different times, both of their answers were the same — that’s why this deal came together.
“Both principles had the same motivation (of keeping the team in New Orleans). David said, ‘We have a commitment to the fans of New Orleans who want the team to stay there, and we’re going to do everything we can to make that happen.”
Along with paying the NBA $338 million for the franchise, Benson also assumed the $125 million in debt the team has on the books.
Forbes Magazine determined in their latest NBA franchise valuation the average NBA team had a value of $393 million. The Forbes 2012 NBA list published in late January determined the Hornets value to be $285 million. The NBA selling the Hornets for $53 million more than Forbes subjective value for the franchise, suggests not only did the league do extremely well in selling the team for $338 million, but the value of an NBA franchise has increased substantially since Forbes January report.
For Sports Business News, this is Howard Bloom
Labels: David Stern, Howard Bloom, New Orleans Hornets, New Orleans Saints, Sports Businesss News, Tom Benson

Joe and Gavin Maloof legally own the Sacramento Kings. However, if their business is going to succeed in Sacramento, the Maloof’s, as most owners of sports franchises, need to work with the local business community and have the support of the local population. As simple as that sounds, the Sacramento Kings uncertain future in Sacramento is for the most part based on the local business community and the Sacramento community no longer prepared to work with the Maloof’s.
The Kings arrived in Sacramento in 1985 after failing to find success in Kansas City. The arena seats 17,317, the lowest capacity of any current NBA facility. The arena cost $40 million to build and opened in 1968 and features none of the revenue-generating amenities most NBA arenas include. The arena has 412 club seats and 30 suites. Most NBA arena arenas have between 1,500 and 2,000 club seats and more than 100 suites.
During the NBA All-Star Weekend in Orlando, the Maloof’s and the City of Sacramento announced plans to build an arena. “Under the proposed terms of the deal, the city will contribute $200-$250 million to the estimated $387 million arena, mostly by leasing out parking garages around the facility,” said a person with knowledge of the negotiations in an ESPN report. That person, speaking on condition of anonymity, because the full financing plan will not be made public until at least Thursday, said Sacramento also will create revenue through a ticket surcharge.
“The Maloofs have agreed to contribute $75 million in upfront cash, which includes the sale of land around the team's current suburban arena, along with paying off a current $67 million loan to the city and contributing more over the course of the deal. Arena operator AEG also agreed to pay almost $60 million.”
That agreement blew up in the faces of the Maloof’s and the NBA on Friday night. There is no longer an arena agreement and the Kings face a very uncertain future in Sacramento.
The deal began falling apart Thursday evening when a group of 24 Sacramento business leaders published a letter in the Sacramento Bee, a letter they had sent to NBA commissioner David Stern. In that letter, the business “strongly suggested” Stern and the NBA encourage the Maloof’s sell the Sacramento Kings. The release of the letter was timed with an update the Maloof’s were providing Stern and the NBA Board of Governors in New York.
Late Thursday night, Sacramento Mayor Kevin Johnson (who played more than 12 seasons in the NBA) took an overnight flight to New York, meeting with Stern and NBA owners on Friday in hopes of making one last attempt to save the proposed Kings’ arena agreement.
“I think that upon closer review, which was their right, the owners of the Kings wanted to reexamine certain assumptions that everyone understood in Orlando (where the agreement was announced) about projections and the like.
“And it made them increasingly uncomfortable…they recognized that the fact that it was necessary to bring in a third party, AEG, because we needed their funds to finance, together with their existing funds, that were necessary for the NBA to advance, came with a cost that further burdened the team, and they ultimately decided that this was not a transaction that they wanted to go forward with, and that's their right.” Stern said Friday evening.
Was it really as simple as a bad deal -- one they should have never agreed to?
“It was a bad deal. The main thing was … the projected revenues were too high. They were at 2005 levels, before the housing bubble burst and the economy went down. We kept telling (NBA attorney) Harvey Benjamin that. He didn't listen, he didn't listen.” Joe Maloof told the Sacramento Bee Saturday.
“We feel like criminals, and we didn't do anything wrong. This was just the wrong time and this was the wrong deal. When the time is right, we'll do a deal. We'll look at another downtown deal or something at Natomas. Bring us a deal we can sign. Nobody wanted to get an arena done more than we did. We've been talking about it for 13 years. Everyone just needs to calm down. We all need to cool off.”
Maloof is correct in suggesting everyone needs to calm down, take a step back, and take a moment to reflect. What isn’t comforting is Joe Maloof’s believes that he and his brother feel like criminals. Maloof stepped pretty close to going over a line in attacking Sacramento Mayor Kevin Johnson Saturday in a USA Today report.
"I don't think I'd want to negotiate with the mayor," Maloof told USA TODAY Sports on Saturday. "Maybe there's someone else that I'd feel more comfortable with.
"We're disappointed in comments made by the mayor that we feel were shots to us that were unfair and not truthful."
Mayor Kevin Johnson's office shot back.
"As their bizarre press conference laid bare for all to see, dealing with the Maloofs is like dealing with the North Koreans— except they are less competent," Chris Lehane, executive director of Think Big, a committee formed by Johnson to keep the Kings in Sacramento, told USA TODAY Sports in a statement. "In Maloof-world, facts are fiction; truths are half-truths; and promises are broken promises. The City of Sacramento deserves better."
The arena agreement was announced as a March NBA deadline was approaching regarding whether or not the Maloof’s were going to relocate the team to Anaheim. The Maloof’s had to let the NBA know where their team was going to play during the 2012- 13 NBA season. The City of Anaheim actively negotiated an agreement with the Maloff’s that would have the Kings relocating to Anaheim next year.
There is little, if any, trust between the Maloof’s and Sacramento following Friday’s news. The business community took a very strong stand – demanding the Maloof’s sell the team before the arena deal fell apart on Friday. Is the Maloof’s next and last move to play the year in Sacramento and a year from now announce the franchise will be moving?
“That's not true, that's not true. I swear that is not going to happen. I don't care what rumors are out there. It's our team. We're not selling, and we're not leaving. Our identity is the Sacramento Kings. That's how we're known,” Joe Maloof said in a Sacramento Bee report.
There are a multitude of issues facing the Maloof’s. If they’re going to stay in Sacramento, those challenges start with trust.
An arena agreement was announced six weeks ago and that agreement is now dead. Joe Maloof can suggest the agreement made no sense but why did he and his brother move forward with that agreement only to realize six short weeks later it made no sense? And if the city of Sacramento and the Kings manage to negotiate another arena agreement, is there anything to suggest Joe and Gavin Maloof might walk away from that agreement?
If Joe and Gavin Maloof decide it’s in their best interest to move their NBA team, would the city they move to have any trust issues with the Maloof’s?
Will Rogers once said: “It takes a lifetime to build a good reputation, but you can lose it in a minute.” For Joe and Gavin Maloof, the mishandling of an agreement to build a new arena for their NBA team might cost them much more than that arena deal, it might cost them their reputations.
For Sports Business News, this is Howard Bloom
Labels: Arco Arena, biz of basketball, David Stern, Howard Bloom, Joe and Gavin Maloof, Kevin Johnson, NBA, Power Balance Pavilion, Sports Business News

Lamar Odom has been paid $24.6 million to play basketball for the last three NBA seasons. Odom played a key role in the Los Angeles Lakers 2010 NBA championship. Last year, Odom was selected as the NBA’s sixth man. Earlier this week, Odom was asked to leave the NBA team he played for this year.
On December 11, 2011, Odom was traded to the Dallas Mavericks for a first-round draft pick and an $8.9 million trade exception after NBA commissioner David Stern vetoed a proposed three-team trade with the New Orleans Hornets involving Odom that would have sent him to the Hornets, Chris Paul to the Lakers, and Pau Gasol to the Houston Rockets. Odom felt "disrespected" after he learned of the Hornets trade publicly, and he requested a trade from the Lakers to another contending team. Later that day, the Lakers traded Odom to the Dallas Mavericks – the defending NBA champions.
The Mavericks and Odom ended their relationship earlier this week. Instead of releasing him, the team listed Odom inactive for the remainder of the season. Odom and the Mavericks didn’t work. Odom missed three Mavericks games after the NBA All-Star break for what was called personal reasons. The Mavericks sent Odom to the Texas Legends of the NBA D-League on March 2. A day later, the Mavericks cancelled the move. On March 24, Odom did not play in a 104–87 loss to the San Antonio Spurs, the first time he could remember not playing due to a coach's decision.
Odom’s Dallas career likely ended Saturday night during halftime of the Mavericks game in Memphis. Mavericks’ owner Mark Cuban visited the teams’ locker room during halftime. Odom had arrived late for the Mavericks home game Friday night and again for a team meeting Saturday morning in Memphis.
Cuban had enough of Odom.
"Well, yeah," Cuban told ESPN Dallas when asked whether that exchange was the final straw. "Just his response to it. Everybody goes through ups and downs. Every player does. We tried to put him in a position to succeed. You guys saw it, saw what we did. It didn't work.
Odom is an interesting off-court case study in what can go wrong for a professional athlete if his focus is taken away from the sport he’s being paid to play. He’s married to reality television personality Khloé Kardashian. Their wedding was featured on the E! reality-based series Keeping Up with the Kardashians, on which Khloé is a regular, with Odom appearing in a handful of episodes. On December 29, 2010, E! announced that it was planning another spinoff from the series featuring Lamar, Khloé and his two children from his previous relationship. The new series debuted on April 10, 2011.
Last year Lakers management voiced their displeasure with the camera crews that constantly followed Odom around.
The circus followed Odom to Dallas. Cuban told the Fort Worth Star Telegram he didn’t believe the camera crew following Odom bothered his team; he did believe the cameras had a negative impact on Odom.
"I do think that if you know you're on camera all the time, you know you're on camera all the time.''
And what precisely what does that mean?
"That means you pay attention to how you're going to look on camera,'' Cuban said.” If you're high enough visibility, you know there's a camera on you all the time and that it's going to show up somewhere, and that can influence your behavior.''
Mark Cuban is a passionate team owner, an owner who loves his team. When he purchased the Mavericks, one of his first decisions was to buy a plane because he wanted his players to travel in comfort. Cuban attends most of his team’s games in Dallas, and when the team is on the road. He’s often seen sitting somewhere near the team’s bench cheering for his team. He wears his heart on his sleeve.
"Everybody goes through ups and downs,'' Cuban said in a Dallas Morning News report. “Every player does. We tried to put him in a position to succeed. It didn't work. And I just asked him, 'Does he want to go for it or not?' I just didn't get a commitment. And that was the end.
"You can kind of tell sometimes when a guy's not focused and ready to play. This [at Memphis] was a big game for us, and he wasn't connecting to that. And if you're not positive energy, you're negative energy.''
Cuban never shies away from speaking his mind – telling the media how he feels. The confrontation between Cuban and Odom on Saturday night wasn’t the first time the two had talked about his attitude.
“I decided to try to help him and turn it into a positive. In any deal, sometimes you're on the right end. Sometimes, you're on the wrong end.
"Did I get my money's worth? No. I don't know that the word's 'cheated.' But did I get my money's worth? No.''
There are many people who do not like professional athletes. Countless people see professional athletes as overpaid and underachieving people. Lamar Odom could be the poster-boy for why so many people dislike professional sports and athletes.
Charles Barkley, a member of the Basketball Hall of Fame, told ESPN Dallas 103.3's while he will always stand by the players as far as the TNT broadcaster is concerned, Odom shouldn’t be paid the remainder of his 2011-12 salary or the $2.4 million buy-out for the final year of his contract.
"I mean, because he didn't earn his salary. He didn't earn it at all. I like Lamar as a person, but I'm disappointed about everything that happened in Dallas. And it's a shame that the Mavs got to pay him, to be honest with you, because he doesn't deserve to get paid for what he put out there this year. He doesn't deserve it, plain and simple.
"To sit at home and make that kind of money really pisses me off, to be honest with you, for the effort that he put out there," Barkley said. "He's going to make hundreds of thousands of dollars these next two paychecks…That's not fair to the Mavs. It's not fair to the game of basketball. I'm just disappointed in Lamar."
If an NFL owner believed a member of his team had underachieved on the football field, that owner could release that player and he wouldn’t have to pay him. NFL player contracts are not guaranteed. NBA, NHL and MLB contracts are guaranteed.
During the recent NBA collective bargaining negotiations, there were suggestions NBA owners wanted to create contractual agreements along the lines of how the NFL operates. If that had taken place, Mark Cuban wouldn’t have to pay Odom the balance of his $8.2 million 2011-12 contract or the buyout he’ll be forced to pay Odom.
Lamar Odom embarrassed himself and NBA players. Even more important, he may one day serve as the reason why NBA players might find it difficult to have their contracts guaranteed.
For Sports Business News, this is Howard Bloom
Labels: biz of basketball, Dallas Mavericks, Howard Bloom, Lamar Odom, Los Angeles Lakers, Mark Cuban, NBA, Sports Business News